Patent Pending — Proprietary Compliance Intelligence Engine

Streamline your AI tool
assessment process

LegisGate eliminates the time required for in-depth global, federal, and state regulation and framework research — delivering AI Tool Intelligence Reports your Data Protection Team can act on at the click of a button.

  • Deterministic rules layer guarantees critical findings — AI-assisted analysis handles nuanced regulatory reasoning within that scaffold
  • Structured intelligence findings with specific legal citations — not generic text output
  • Your DPT records the deployment decision; LegisGate documents the research and due diligence

✓ 2 full reports included · ✓ No credit card required · ✓ 14-day trial

1 / 5
Intelligence Engine — Live Demo

See what LegisGate produces for your AI tools.

Select a tool. Describe your deployment. Watch the engine work — then see exactly what your Data Protection Team would receive.

Select a tool
Deployment use case
Free preview · No email required · No credit card
Your team would spend 8–11 weeks on this manually.
Salesforce Einstein AI
Mortgage / Lending
Demo preview
What you get in one click
  • Every finding cited to the actual regulation
  • Every action item assigned to the right team
  • Every gap documented and defensible
Output format
Decision-ready report with findings, citations, and action items assigned to the right team.
CitationsGapsAction itemsPDF export
What motivates teams to act
EU AI Act
Classification + transparency obligations
GDPR
DPA / transfers / DPIA triggers
Colorado AI Act
Impact assessment + notices for high-risk AI
Next: Click Run Intelligence Analysis to watch the pipeline and generate the report.

With the click of a button. Every compliance gap.
Cited to the actual regulation.

We do the research. Your team makes the determination.

Assessment Report
Summit CRM AI
Missing DPA — GDPR Art. 28
No SCCs documented
Training data opt-out unclear
Risk score74
Assessment Report
Atlas Workspace AI
Missing BAA — HIPAA §164.504
KVKK Board approval required
UK GDPR DPA not executed
Risk score62
Assessment Report
Clarity Voice AI
BAA missing — deployment blocked
FDA SaMD classification needed
EU AI Act: Limited-risk ✓
Risk score85
Assessment Report
Apex AI Enterprise
No human oversight for triage
GDPR Art. 22 safeguards absent
Sub-processor list incomplete
Risk score68
Assessment Report
DevFlow AI Assistant
IP ownership not addressed
Code training data opt-out
LGPD transfer gap — Brazil ops
Risk score58

Every finding traces back to the actual regulation.

Not a summary. Not an interpretation. The article, section, and provision — so your legal team can verify every citation with a single click. We do the research. You own the outcome.

GDPREU AI ActUK GDPRHIPAAKVKKrevFADPLGPDPDPANIST AI RMF+18 more
AI Tool Intelligence Reports

Streamline the AI tool assessment process for your entire organization.

Each AI Tool Intelligence Report is cited, traceable regulatory intelligence — linked to the primary law, scoped to your jurisdiction, and ready for your Data Protection Team to verify with a click. Less research burden, same rigor.

Cited to the actual regulation.

Every intelligence finding in your report links to the primary source — the actual article, section, and provision. Your legal team can verify every citation with a single click. Not a summary. Not an interpretation. The regulation itself.

GDPR Art. 28EU AI Act Art. 14HIPAA 164.504KVKK Art. 9

27+ frameworks. Every jurisdiction.

GDPR, EU AI Act, UK GDPR, HIPAA, KVKK, revFADP, LGPD, PDPA, NIST AI RMF, FTC Act, CCPA, and more — researched automatically for every AI Tool Intelligence Report, scoped to your organization's footprint and industry profile.

🇪🇺 GDPR🇬🇧 UK GDPR🇺🇸 HIPAA🇨🇭 revFADP🇹🇷 KVKK🌐 EU AI Act

Your team decides. Always.

LegisGate surfaces the gaps and cites the law in each AI Tool Intelligence Report. Your legal and privacy team reviews the intelligence and records the deployment decision. We do the research. You own the outcome.

“LegisGate produces cited intelligence reports. Your legal team makes the determination.”

How It Works

From tool request to compliance decision.

Four steps from intake to archived record. Your team owns step one and step three. The intelligence engine produces each AI Tool Intelligence Report in between.

Your team

Submit the AI tool request

Intake

Fill out a brief intake form — the AI tool name, how it will be used, and who will use it. LegisGate automatically pulls the vendor's public documentation, privacy policy, and DPA.

📝Tool name + use case
👥User population
🔒Data types involved

LegisGate

Intelligence engine researches every applicable jurisdiction

Automated

Using your company's operating locations and industry, the proprietary compliance intelligence engine maps every applicable jurisdiction and cross-references the regulations that apply — building the foundation for your AI Tool Intelligence Report.

⚖️Maps applicable jurisdictions from your operating locations
📋Identifies every regulation for your industry + tool type
📄Reads vendor privacy policy, DPA, and documentation
🛡️Pulls Defender security scores and certification status
📡Cross-references 47 live regulatory feeds + enforcement history
🔍Detects shadow AI already in use via your Defender deployment
Jurisdictions researched:🇺🇸 HIPAA + CCPA🇪🇺 GDPR + EU AI Act🇬🇧 UK GDPR🇨🇭 revFADP🇹🇷 KVKK🇨🇦 PIPEDA+ 34 more

Your legal & privacy team

Reviews the findings and makes the decision

Human decision

Your legal and privacy team receives the complete AI Tool Intelligence Report with every applicable regulation cited and every action item drafted. They review each finding, set conditions if needed, and render the deployment verdict. LegisGate never makes this decision — it's always human-owned.

Approved
Approved w/ Conditions
Denied

LegisGate

Archives the report & Final Designation record

Defensible

A fully cited, audit-ready AI Tool Intelligence Report — exportable as PDF or Word, ready for your board, an auditor, or a regulator. Every finding links to the official legal text. Final Designation Reports document DPT decisions. Action items pre-assigned with deadlines.

⚖️Cited regulatory findings
🤖EU AI Act classification
🗺️Jurisdiction-specific findings
🔄Transfer mechanisms (SCCs, IDTA)
🏥HIPAA / sector requirements
Action items by role + deadline
📑Procurement contract language
👁️Shadow AI discovery report
🔔Risk-based reassessment reminders

Reassessment reminder sent based on your cadence

LegisGate tracks every assessed tool against your organization's risk-based reassessment schedule — Critical tools every 6 months, standard tools annually — and sends reminders to your team before due dates arrive.

Formats:PDFWord (.docx)Print-readyAudit trail
Your 24/7 Compliance Intelligence

Ask LegisGate™ anything.
It knows your org, not just the law.

ChatGPT can tell you what GDPR Article 22 says. Ask LegisGate can tell you exactly how Article 22 applies to your deployment of this specific AI tool given your locations in the EU, your healthcare industry classification, and the findings already in your AI Tool Intelligence Report.

That's the difference between a regulatory encyclopedia and an intelligence layer that knows your organization. Available one click away, 24 hours a day, from anywhere in the platform.

🗺️
Knows your locations & industry
Answers are contextualized to your jurisdictions — not generic regulatory summaries
📋
Knows every AI Tool Intelligence Report
Ask about any vendor, any finding, any decision your team has made
Available 24/7 — one click, anywhere
Your DPO team doesn't wait for a lawyer to be available to answer a compliance question
legisgate.com / ask
Online 24/7
Org context:
🇺🇸 United States🇪🇺 EU🇬🇧 UK🇨🇭 Switzerland⚕️ Healthcare
Does the EU AI Act apply to our deployment of Aurora Clinical Scribe?
LG

Yes — your EU operations put you directly in scope.

Aurora Clinical Scribe falls under Annex III §5(a) — AI systems influencing patient safety decisions are high-risk. Your three EU clinical sites trigger the full obligation set:

Art. 14
Human oversight
Art. 11
Technical docs
Art. 43
Conformity assessment

Based on your Aurora Clinical Scribe AI Tool Intelligence Report · 3 related findings · 5 action items open

What do we need before we can deploy in our UK hospitals?
LG

For UK deployment, your open action items are: UK IDTA execution (Legal — overdue), UK AI Act alignment statement (DPO — due Apr 15), and UK GDPR Art. 35 DPIA (Privacy team — not started). I can draft the DPIA scope document if you'd like.

Cross-report view

"Which of our assessed vendors have open GDPR Art. 28 issues?"

Risk quantification

"What's the penalty exposure if we deploy this tool without the BAA?"

Action drafting

"Draft a vendor email requesting the missing DPA for Aurora Clinical Scribe."

Three waves. One platform.

Every organization you meet is facing three regulatory waves simultaneously.

GDPR has been enforceable for years and AI tools are still behind. The EU AI Act high-risk deadline is August 2, 2026 — with a December 2027 extension proposed but not yet legally binding. The Colorado AI Act — the most comprehensive US state AI law — applies to the deploying organization, not just the vendor.

Wave 1 — Already Here

GDPR (EU & UK)

€1.2B
Largest fine (Meta, 2023)
€4.4B+
Total fines issued to date
8 yrs
In enforcement

Applies to any org processing EU/UK personal data — regardless of where you're headquartered. Most AI tools are out of compliance on the first day of use.

  • DPA required for every AI vendor (Art. 28)
  • Cross-border transfer mechanisms — SCCs or DPF
  • Automated decision-making rights (Art. 22)

LegisGate: Cited findings for every Article. Enforcement history from GDPRhub. Separate EU GDPR and UK GDPR findings with jurisdiction-specific transfer mechanisms.

Wave 2 — Deadline Approaching
EXTRATERRITORIAL

EU AI Act

Aug 2026
Current legal deadline
€35M
Max penalty (7% global revenue)
0
Fines issued yet

⚡ Dec 2, 2027 extension proposed (EU Digital Omnibus) — pending formal adoption. August 2026 remains the current enforceable deadline.

The world's first comprehensive AI law. Most organizations can't classify their tools yet — let alone document the 7 deployer obligations under Article 26. Either deadline, preparation is mandatory now.

  • Art. 50 transparency already enforceable (Aug 2025)
  • High-risk: conformity assessment + human oversight (Art. 26)
  • AI literacy required for ALL deployers now (Art. 4)

LegisGate: Dedicated EU AI Act tab on every AI Tool Intelligence Report. Automatic classification through the mandatory 5-step sequence. All 113 articles in Ask LegisGate.

Wave 3 — The Sleeper
US LAW

Colorado AI Act

~107
Days to full enforcement
$200K
Per violation
YOU
Liable as deployer

The most comprehensive US state AI law — and the one that catches everyone off guard. Unlike most regulations, this one applies to the deployer, not the vendor. Your organization is directly liable.

  • Covers hiring, lending, insurance, healthcare, housing
  • Risk management policy + impact assessments required
  • Colorado is first — 18+ states are following

LegisGate: Flags Colorado AI Act in every AI Tool Intelligence Report. Full US state law analysis covering 18+ states with triggers, provisions, and deployer obligations.

LegisGate™ covers all three — plus 40+ countries and 47 live regulatory feeds — with the click of a button.

Wave 1 is already here. Wave 2 current deadline is August 2026 (December 2027 extension proposed — not yet binding). Wave 3 enforcement begins June 2026. Manual review can't keep up. LegisGate™ can.

The Research

The AI Tool Intelligence Report Bottleneck

Producing each AI tool assessment internally takes far longer than a standard vendor review. EU AI Act classification, training data governance, bias evaluation, multi-jurisdictional analysis — they turn weeks into months and stall your deployment queue.

8–12 wks

Average time to produce an AI tool intelligence package in-house

ProcessUnity 2026
60%

of organizations wait 4–12 months for vendor responses

ProcessUnity 2026
37.4 hrs

Spent per week on vendor diligence — up 14 hrs year-over-year

Whistic 2025
27%

of vendors never respond to diligence questionnaires at all

Whistic 2025

Real-world comparison

A Fortune 500 legal and privacy team assessed Prezent.AI using three team members over 11 weeks. They still missed the absent Data Processing Agreement and EU AI Act transparency obligations already in effect. LegisGate™ produced a more comprehensive AI Tool Intelligence Report — with regulatory citations, contract risk scoring, vendor document gap detection, and a tracked remediation workflow — with the click of a button.

Manual
11 wks
LegisGate™
1 click
with better coverage

Sources: ProcessUnity State of Third-Party Risk Assessments 2026 · Whistic 2025 TPRM Impact Report · AvePoint AI Readiness Report 2025

Inside every AI Tool Intelligence Report your DPO actually wants to open.

Streamline the assessment workflow: every finding cited to the exact regulation, official legal text quoted inline, action items pre-drafted with owners and deadlines. Export to PDF, Word, or print — audit-ready.

legisgate.com / assessments / CG-2026-00006 / report
.pdf.docx.txt
CG-2026-00006
AI Tool Intelligence Report
Apex AI Pro — Customer Support Triage
High RiskJMDPO: Approved with Conditions
Report type
Vendor Tool
Date Generated
March 4, 2026
Analyst
Sarah Chen
Vendor
Apex Technologies
68
Risk Score
JM
DPO Decision — human reviewed & authorized
James Martinez approved with conditions
March 4, 2026 · LegisGate provided the research
EU AI Act ClassificationHigh-Risk
This system performs automated customer support triage, which constitutes an AI system making decisions that significantly affect natural persons under Annex III, Section 8(b). Requires conformity assessment under Art. 43, technical documentation under Art. 11, and human oversight measures under Art. 14.
Findings17 total
2 Critical
3 High
6 Medium
4 Low
2 Info
CriticalData Transfers
Cross-border transfer to US — no Standard Contractual Clauses executed
Description
Customer support data processed on US servers. No SCCs or adequacy decision covers the transfer. Transfer Impact Assessment required.
Legal Basis
GDPR Art. 46(2)(c)Standard Contractual ClausesView official text →
"Transfers to third countries permitted where the controller or processor has provided appropriate safeguards, including standard data protection clauses adopted by the Commission."
Recommendation
Execute Standard Contractual Clauses with OpenAI before go-live. Complete Transfer Impact Assessment documenting US surveillance law risk.
Owner: LegalTimeline: Before go-live
HighHuman Oversight
No human oversight documented for automated customer triage
Description
System routes support tickets without human review. Customers may be denied service escalation based on automated classification.
Legal Basis
EU AI Act Art. 14Human oversightView official text →
"High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that they can be effectively overseen by natural persons during the period in which they are in use."
Recommendation
Implement human-in-the-loop review for all escalation denials. Document override procedures and make accessible to support leads.
Owner: Support OpsTimeline: 30 days
MediumData Accuracy
Model outputs may generate hallucinated customer PII
Description
GPT-based systems may fabricate plausible-looking customer details (names, account numbers) in generated responses.
Legal Basis
GDPR Art. 5(1)(d)Accuracy principleView official text →
"Personal data shall be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date; every reasonable step must be taken to ensure that inaccurate personal data are erased or rectified without delay."
Recommendation
Add output filtering to flag responses containing customer identifiers. Require agent verification before sending AI-drafted replies containing PII.
Owner: EngineeringTimeline: 60 days
+ 14 more findings with cited law, recommendations, and assigned owners
AI Tool Intelligence Report · LegisGate™ · Export to PDF, Word, or Print · Full audit trail

Your legal and privacy team reviews and decides. They don't start a research project.

The Intelligence Gap

AI Tools Are Flooding Your Enterprise. Your Governance Process Can't Keep Up.

The average enterprise now receives hundreds of AI tool deployment requests annually. Each one should produce a defensible AI Tool Intelligence Report across overlapping frameworks — GDPR, EU AI Act, UK GDPR, HIPAA, KVKK, revFADP, and dozens more.

Thorough manual research takes weeks. Most teams can finish two proper assessments a month.

The rest get waved through — or blocked entirely. Neither answer is acceptable.

OneTrust / TrustArc
Great at

Vendor lifecycle, privacy program management, consent, DSRs, cookie compliance, full GRC workflow.

The gap

Manual AI tool assessments take weeks. Templates aren't built for AI-specific risks or EU AI Act classification.

Microsoft Defender
Great at

Security posture, threat detection, app discovery, security scoring for 31,000+ cloud apps.

The gap

Scores a vendor's security. Doesn't tell you if their AI violates GDPR Art. 22 or triggers EU AI Act high-risk obligations.

LegisGate™ — the missing piece

The compliance intelligence engine for AI Tool Intelligence Reports. Combines Defender signals, OneTrust workflows, and global regulatory data into one platform.

  • AI Tool Intelligence Reports with cited findings — GDPR, EU AI Act, CCPA, HIPAA + more
  • Leverages what you already own — Defender, OneTrust, Jira
  • Compliance monitoring & continuous alerts
  • Doesn't replace your tools — streamlines the assessment process end to end.
Authorization Failure

AI tools follow instructions from people they shouldn't trust

In documented cases, AI systems returned internal records to unauthorized requesters. The tool wasn't hacked — it was asked politely.

Reliability Failure

They report tasks as complete when the work wasn't done

If you can't trust an AI tool's status reports, you can't build reliable processes on top of it. This has been reproduced across multiple systems.

Oversight Failure

They take drastic actions to resolve ambiguity

Conflicting instructions led one documented AI to destroy its own infrastructure. The intentions were correct. The judgment was not.

Propagation Failure

Unsafe practices spread between AI tools

When one AI in a shared environment adopted risky behavior, others picked it up without human intervention. Governance can't be optional.

These aren't bugs that vendors will patch. They're emergent properties of giving AI systems autonomy, memory, and access to your infrastructure. They require governance, not just security. LegisGate™ analyzes AI-specific risks — prompt injection, hallucination, unauthorized action, training data exposure, and meaningful human oversight — alongside the data protection fundamentals your legal and privacy team already knows.

How It Works

Four Steps. Click of a Button, Not Months.

Connect your tools once. After that, every AI tool follows the same streamlined path to an AI Tool Intelligence Report.

LegisGate does the research.
Your legal team makes the call.

LegisGate™ cross-references the vendor's privacy policy, DPA, and public documentation against Defender security data, your OneTrust records, and current regulatory requirements across multiple jurisdictions. Your legal and privacy team gets a finished AI Tool Intelligence Report — not a research project. The deployment determination stays human-owned, always.

Explore the full platform →
1
Submit the AI tool
Enter the vendor name or URL. LegisGate™ pulls public info automatically.
2
Intelligence engine researches
Privacy policy, DPA, Defender scores, regulatory requirements — cross-referenced in parallel.
3
AI Tool Intelligence Report ready
Categorized intelligence findings, each linked to GDPR, EU AI Act, or CCPA provisions. Action items pre-drafted.
4
Legal & privacy team reviews and decides
Approve, reject, or approve with conditions. Tasks auto-assigned to stakeholders.
01

Connect Once

Defender, OneTrust, Jira, ServiceNow — link them once. LegisGate™ uses what you already pay for.

02

Submit

Your team enters the tool they want under Active Assessments. LegisGate™ pulls vendor details automatically.

03

Generate report

Detailed intelligence findings, each citing the exact regulation. EU AI Act classification included.

04

Decide

Your legal or privacy lead reviews a finished report and makes a decision. Not starts a research project.

The Right Division of Labor

LegisGate does the research. Your legal team makes the call.

EU AI Act Article 14 requires human oversight of high-risk AI. GDPR Article 22 prohibits fully automated decisions affecting individuals. LegisGate is built around that principle — your legal and privacy team doesn't get replaced, they get a defensible foundation to make faster, better-informed decisions.

LegisGate™ does the research
  • Reads privacy policies, DPAs, and vendor documentation
  • Cross-references 40+ regulatory frameworks simultaneously
  • Produces intelligence findings with official legal text cited inline
  • Pre-drafts vendor outreach and conditions letters
  • Assigns action items by role and deadline
Your DPO makes every decision
  • Reviews and accepts or overrides individual findings
  • Approves, rejects, or approves with conditions
  • Sets deployment timelines and requirements
  • Signs off on vendor agreements and compliance records
  • Owns the audit trail — fully defensible, human-authorized

This isn't just good practice — it's what the regulators require. And it's how LegisGate was designed from day one.

Who It's For

Built for the Teams in the Middle

Between the business teams demanding AI tools and the regulators demanding compliance — your people are caught in the middle. LegisGate™ gives them leverage.

Legal & Privacy Counsel

"I get 10 new AI tool requests a month. Each one takes 3–6 weeks to assess."

LegisGate™ delivers a complete AI Tool Intelligence Report with the click of a button. You review a finished report — you don't build one from scratch.

Privacy Analysts

"I spend days reading privacy policies and DPAs for every AI vendor."

LegisGate™ reads them for you, cross-references regulations, and flags what matters. Prior AI Tool Intelligence Reports mean repeat vendors move faster.

Procurement

"We can't issue a PO until the legal and privacy team approves the vendor. The backlog delays everything."

Active assessments compress from months to days. Vendor questionnaires are analyzed before your team even opens them.

Legal

"I get pulled into vendor reviews for AI risks I barely understand."

Every finding cites the specific article, quotes the text, and links to the source. Legal verifies — they don't research.

Business Teams

"It's been stuck in active assessments for 3 months. We're about to just use it anyway."

That's how shadow AI starts. LegisGate™ streamlines the process — fast AI Tool Intelligence Reports — yes, no, or yes with conditions — so people don't go rogue.

CISOs

"Defender shows unapproved AI tools. But we can't assess the privacy risk."

LegisGate™ turns Defender detections into AI Tool Intelligence Reports at the click of a button. Security and privacy finally work from the same data.

Objection Handling

When someone says…

The six objections that come up in every conversation — and exactly why they don't hold up.

We already use OneTrust.

OneTrust manages your GRC workflows. LegisGate produces the AI Tool Intelligence Reports that feed into OneTrust. We're the intelligence layer, they're the workflow layer — complementary, not competing.

We can just use ChatGPT for this.

Try asking ChatGPT to produce a structured AI Tool Intelligence Report for a specific tool against GDPR, EU AI Act, HIPAA, and state laws — with cited findings, pre-drafted vendor emails, and a tracked action item list. Then compare that to what LegisGate delivers with the click of a button.

The EU AI Act doesn't apply to us.

Do you have EU employees, EU customers, or AI tools used by anyone in the EU? The Act has extraterritorial reach — same as GDPR. And the Colorado AI Act applies regardless of where your organization is headquartered.

We'll deal with it when fines start.

The prohibited practices provisions have been enforceable since February 2025. Article 50 transparency since August 2025. The Colorado AI Act takes effect in June. By the time fines start, you're already non-compliant.

Our legal team handles this.

How long does it take them to complete one AI tool assessment? LegisGate delivers an AI Tool Intelligence Report in place of weeks of manual research — at the click of a button. Your legal team reviews the output — they don't build it from scratch.

How do we know the intelligence reports are accurate?

Every finding is verified against primary regulatory sources. Every citation links to the official legal text. Ask LegisGate answers any article-level question about any finding. It's not a black box — it's a citable, defensible AI Tool Intelligence Report.

Can we trust an AI to make compliance decisions for us?

LegisGate doesn't make compliance determinations — your legal and privacy team does. The intelligence engine does the research sprint that would take your team weeks: reading policies, cross-referencing regulations, producing cited intelligence findings. Your team reviews everything and makes the final determination. Human judgment stays in charge.

LegisGate™ doesn't just identify risks.

It tells the organization exactly what they need to do to comply, who's responsible, and gives them pre-drafted outreach to their vendors. That's the difference between a report that sits in a folder and a report that drives action.

Finding Verified
GDPR Art. 28 · Data Processing Agreement
High Risk
Primary Regulation
GDPR Art. 28 — Processor obligations
“Processing by a processor shall be governed by a contract or other legal act under Union or Member State law, that is binding on the processor with regard to the controller...”
eur-lex.europa.eu → Official text ↗
EU AI Act Art. 14 — Human oversight
“High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that natural persons can effectively oversee them...”
artificialintelligenceact.eu → Official text ↗
DPO

Your team reviews this intelligence and makes the determination.

Built for legal standards

Built for the standard your legal team holds itself to.

Legal and compliance professionals don't accept black-box outputs. They need to know where the finding came from, which regulation it cites, and whether they can stand behind it in a regulatory inquiry.

Every intelligence finding in your AI Tool Intelligence Report links to the primary regulation. Every jurisdiction is tracked separately. Every recommendation traces back to a specific legal obligation.

Your legal team doesn't have to trust LegisGate's judgment. They can verify every citation themselves.

“That's not the engine making a compliance decision. That's the intelligence layer doing the research so your experts can decide.”

Primary source linked
Jurisdiction-separated
Human determination

Enterprise-ready data protection

GDPR-compliant Data Processing Agreement available for enterprise customers. EU SCCs, UK IDTA, and Swiss SCCs included for international transfers.

Request a DPA →

Permanently archived reports

Every Final Designation Report is timestamped and permanently archived — providing auditable evidence of your due diligence for regulators and auditors.

Proprietary intelligence engine

Patent pending methodology combining deterministic regulatory rules with AI-assisted analysis — not a chatbot, not a document scanner.

How it works →
Free Trial

See what your team has been missing.

Pick a real AI tool your organization is evaluating. Run it through the LegisGate engine. Every finding cited to the actual regulation. In under 60 seconds.

✓ 2 full AI Tool Intelligence Reports included · ✓ No credit card required

Start for free

Your next AI tool request
is already in the queue.

Start your free trial today. 2 full AI Tool Intelligence Reports, no credit card required, full engine — not a demo.